Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
grade mix per operator — percentile means across peer groups are a blunt signal, the mix is the comparable statisticChains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↑ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|
| COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 31.6 | 2 | hospice | — | 0 |
| COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 36.3 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA | 2 |
| 0.0% | 19.2 | 1 | home health,snf | 106 | 0 |
| COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK OF FLORIDA, LLC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 65.8 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| Companion Care Of Rochester, Inc. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 67.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| COMPASSION CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 75.1 | 2 | snf | 254 | 0 |
| COMPASSION HOSPICE CORP | 2 |
| 0.0% | 61.2 | 1 | hospice | — | 0 |
| COMPASSIONATE HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 17.0 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| COMPLETE HOME CARE - PRIVATE DUTY LLC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 98.5 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CONFLUENCE HEALTH | 2 |
| 0.0% | 37.0 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| CONNECT HEALTHCARE LLC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 87.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| Connected Home Care LLC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 71.4 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| CONTINUUM HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 28.5 | 1 | snf | 112 | 0 |
| CONTINUUM HOME SERVICES INC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 74.6 | 1 | snf | 178 | 0 |
| CONTINUUMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 27.5 | 1 | home health,snf | 131 | 0 |
| COOK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 2 |
| 0.0% | 21.0 | 1 | home health,snf | 37 | 0 |
| CORNERSTONE 18 OPERATIONS LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 49.4 | 1 | snf | 233 | 0 |
| COTEAU DES PRAIRIES HOSPITAL | 2 |
| 0.0% | 62.8 | 1 | home health,snf | 40 | 0 |
| COTTON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST | 2 |
| 0.0% | 30.0 | 1 | snf | 219 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF CALHOUN | 2 |
| 0.0% | 28.6 | 2 | home health,snf | 120 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF CHEMUNG | 2 |
| 0.0% | 45.1 | 1 | home health,snf | 200 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF HARNEY | 2 |
| 0.0% | 33.1 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| COUNTY OF JEFFERSON | 2 |
| 0.0% | 39.2 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| COUNTY OF LA CROSSE | 2 |
| 0.0% | 8.1 | 1 | snf | 87 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF PIPESTONE | 2 |
| 0.0% | 17.7 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| COUNTY OF SULLIVAN | 2 |
| 100.0% | 85.3 | 1 | home health,snf | 146 | 0 |
| CR 125, LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 39.8 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| CRESCENT HEALTHCARE INC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 97.3 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CRESCENT HEALTHCARE, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 30.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CROSSROADS LIVING CENTER, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 51.1 | 1 | icf iid | 12 | 0 |
| CRUZ HOMECARE & EDUCATIONAL SERVICES LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 26.6 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CRYSTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC. | 2 |
| 100.0% | 93.9 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CSJ INITIATIVES INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 19.8 | 2 | snf | 78 | 0 |
| CSL BAYTOWN, LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 22.6 | 1 | alf | — | 1 |
| CTM ASSISTED LIVING LP | 2 |
| 0.0% | 6.2 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| CTNC HOLDINGS LLC | 2 |
| 100.0% | 87.7 | 1 | snf | 280 | 0 |
| CYPRESS MANOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY, LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 6.0 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| D & E HOMES | 2 |
| 0.0% | 63.9 | 1 | icf iid | 12 | 0 |
| DACARE, INC. | 2 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | adult day | — | 2 |
| DALLAMHARTLEY COUNTIES HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 2 |
| 50.0% | 84.5 | 1 | alf,nf | 67 | 0 |
| Danforth Assisted Living Program LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 14.0 | 1 | alf,home health | — | 1 |
| DARSEA HOLDINGS, LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 31.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | 2 |
| 0.0% | 76.9 | 1 | snf | 314 | 0 |
| David J. Wegman | 2 |
| 0.0% | 58.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| DAVIS HEALTH SYSTEM | 2 |
| 0.0% | 44.0 | 1 | home health,snf | 60 | 0 |
| DB & YP SERVICES CORP | 2 |
| 0.0% | 21.1 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| DE LEON COUNTRY MAUREEN'S HOME, LLC | 2 |
| 50.0% | 75.1 | 1 | icf iid | 12 | 0 |
| DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM INC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 11.6 | 2 | hospice,snf | 30 | 0 |
| DEBO JOKODOLA | 2 |
| 0.0% | 21.3 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| DEITY CARES ASSISTED LIVING LLC | 2 |
| 0.0% | 41.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.