Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
grade mix per operator — percentile means across peer groups are a blunt signal, the mix is the comparable statisticChains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↓ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|
| MINNEWASKA LUTHERAN HOME | 3 |
| 0.0% | 19.6 | 1 | snf | 104 | 0 |
| MIRLIS CHILDREN TRUST | 3 |
| 33.3% | 83.8 | 1 | snf | 370 | 0 |
| MLS ACQUISITION LLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 74.9 | 2 | snf | 343 | 0 |
| MOMENTUM HEALTHCARE LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 58.1 | 1 | snf | 327 | 0 |
| MONTEBELLO HOLDINGS LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 60.5 | 2 | home health | — | 0 |
| MORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES | 3 |
| 0.0% | 45.8 | 1 | alf,hospice,snf | 0 | 0 |
| MORNINGSTAR ASSISTED LIVING LLC | 3 |
| 66.7% | 78.0 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| MOSES STRAUSS FAMILY 2022 TRUST | 3 |
| 0.0% | 47.2 | 3 | snf | 323 | 0 |
| Mrs. G'S Services, Llc | 3 |
| 33.3% | 49.6 | 1 | home health | — | 1 |
| MUSTANG CREEK MANAGEMENT, LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 28.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| MY CENTRIC HEALTHCARE LLC | 3 |
| 66.7% | 84.9 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| Nae Edison, Llc | 3 |
| 0.0% | 13.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| NATIONWIDE HEALTHCARE SERVICES | 3 |
| 33.3% | 57.2 | 2 | snf | 310 | 0 |
| NAVARRE GARDENS, LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 40.3 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| NEBRASKA METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 50.7 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 106 | 0 |
| NEIGHBORLY CARE NETWORK, INC. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 52.5 | 1 | adult day | — | 0 |
| NET45 LLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 44.9 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| NEW HORIZON HOMES LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 16.7 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| NEW HORIZONS: SERVING INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS | 3 |
| 0.0% | 40.0 | 1 | icf iid | 18 | 0 |
| New Partners, Inc. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 15.6 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| NEW START CLHF'S INDEPENDENT TRAINING CENTERS | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | alf | 18 | 3 |
| NHC OP LP | 3 |
| 0.0% | 43.4 | 2 | snf | 397 | 0 |
| Niagara Homemaker Services, Inc. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 3 |
| NIGHTINGALE HEALTHCARE LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 10.6 | 1 | snf | 182 | 0 |
| NJ CHICAGO OPCO HOLDCO LLC | 3 |
| 100.0% | 97.9 | 1 | snf | 609 | 0 |
| NORTH AND SOUTH OF MARKET ADULT DAY HEALTH CORPORATION | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | adult day | — | 3 |
| NORTH MISSISSIPPI HEALTH SERVICES INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 25.7 | 2 | home health,hospice,snf | 79 | 0 |
| NORTHERN INDIANA INTERIM HEALTHCARE COMPANY LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 59.8 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| Nursecore Management Services-New York, L.L.C. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 39.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OHIO LIVING | 3 |
| 0.0% | 66.6 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| OKLAHOMA HOMECARE LLC | 3 |
| 100.0% | 89.0 | 2 | home health | — | 0 |
| OLSON HEALTHCARE LLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 54.2 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| ON LOK SENIOR HEALTH SERVICES | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | adult day | — | 3 |
| Onsite Lifecare, Inc. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OPTIMUM PERSONAL CARE SUGARLAND 1 LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 24.7 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| OPTUM INFUSION SERVICES 204 INC | 3 |
| 100.0% | 97.4 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OPTUM INFUSION SERVICES 205 INC | 3 |
| 100.0% | 97.4 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| OPUSCARE HOLDINGS LLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 84.4 | 3 | hospice | — | 0 |
| ORANGE CITY MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL | 3 |
| 0.0% | 22.3 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 95 | 0 |
| ORCHARDS FAMILY MANAGEMENT LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 50.2 | 2 | snf | 188 | 0 |
| ORCHID CARE HOMES LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 24.1 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| ORIOL HOLDING INC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 36.9 | 1 | home health,snf | 215 | 0 |
| ORLANDO HEALTH INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 38.2 | 1 | snf | 258 | 0 |
| ORPAS CORPORATION | 3 |
| 0.0% | 36.7 | 1 | icf iid | 18 | 0 |
| OSA HERITAGE HOMES, INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 53.7 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| OVATION HOSPICE HOLDING BLLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 56.0 | 3 | hospice | — | 0 |
| OWENSBORO HEALTH INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 37.2 | 1 | home health,snf | 45 | 0 |
| OXFORD MANAGEMENT GROUP | 3 |
| 0.0% | 37.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| PA 3 HOLDCO | 3 |
| 33.3% | 80.7 | 1 | snf | 232 | 0 |
| PACIFIC SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 45.5 | 1 | snf | 237 | 0 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.