Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
grade mix per operator — percentile means across peer groups are a blunt signal, the mix is the comparable statisticChains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↓ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|
| RCP TCT LLC | 7 |
| 57.1% | 75.8 | 3 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES OF AMERICA LLC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 45.5 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 30.7 | 2 | snf | 303 | 0 |
| SANDRA CHEEK FARMER TRUST | 7 |
| 42.9% | 58.2 | 1 | hospice,snf | 515 | 0 |
| SAPPHIRE HEALTHCARE SRVS | 7 |
| 0.0% | 47.1 | 1 | snf | 416 | 0 |
| SG PT LLC | 7 |
| 42.9% | 76.1 | 5 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| SPYGLASS HEALTHCARE LLC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 43.8 | 1 | snf | 622 | 0 |
| SRI NIGHTINGALE LLC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 50.2 | 3 | snf | 730 | 0 |
| STEPHENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 7 |
| 14.3% | 64.8 | 1 | snf | 0 | 0 |
| STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TR | 7 |
| 42.9% | 80.1 | 1 | snf | 996 | 0 |
| THE CARMELITE SYSTEM INC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 44.8 | 6 | snf | 1,042 | 0 |
| THE LTM GROUP LLC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 58.7 | 3 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| TREND CONSULTANTS LLC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 12.2 | 1 | snf | 508 | 0 |
| TRILOGY OPCO LLC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 59.9 | 2 | snf | 452 | 0 |
| TYLER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 7 |
| 14.3% | 65.4 | 1 | snf | 0 | 0 |
| UNIDINE CORPORATION | 7 |
| 0.0% | 29.5 | 5 | snf | 1,069 | 0 |
| WESTMINSTER SERVICES INC | 7 |
| 0.0% | 38.2 | 1 | snf | 650 | 0 |
| WHEAT CHAFF LP | 7 |
| 42.9% | 83.7 | 2 | snf | 1,272 | 0 |
| WHITE RIVER HEALTHCARE LLC | 7 |
| 28.6% | 63.1 | 1 | snf | 953 | 0 |
| WOODLAND RESIDENTIAL SERVICES, INC. | 7 |
| 0.0% | 61.7 | 1 | icf iid | 42 | 0 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | 7 |
| 28.6% | 56.4 | 4 | home health | — | 0 |
| 603 HEALTHCARE LLC | 6 |
| 0.0% | 51.9 | 1 | snf | 445 | 0 |
| A&R STERN FAMILY MD7 LLC | 6 |
| 16.7% | 74.9 | 1 | snf | 926 | 0 |
| AHUMADA HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | 6 |
| 0.0% | 64.1 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| ALLIED SERVICES FOUNDATION | 6 |
| 0.0% | 32.7 | 1 | hospice,snf | 647 | 0 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH | 6 |
| 16.7% | 55.0 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| BCP IOWA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | 6 |
| 16.7% | 57.5 | 2 | snf | 462 | 0 |
| BELEW LLC | 6 |
| 0.0% | 47.0 | 1 | snf | 550 | 0 |
| BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC | 6 |
| 16.7% | 50.6 | 2 | home health,hospice,snf | 326 | 0 |
| BJC HEALTH SYSTEM | 6 |
| 0.0% | 36.5 | 3 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| BLACK RIVER HEALTHCARE LLC | 6 |
| 0.0% | 43.4 | 1 | snf | 723 | 0 |
| BOOKER HOSPITAL DISTRICT | 6 |
| 16.7% | 61.5 | 1 | snf | 0 | 0 |
| BRIAR HILL MANAGEMENT LLC | 6 |
| 0.0% | 26.1 | 1 | snf | 383 | 0 |
| BY THE BAY HEALTH | 6 |
| 0.0% | 22.1 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| CAPITAL HEALTH SERVICES INC | 6 |
| 0.0% | 45.1 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 136 | 0 |
| CAR HOLDINGS LLC | 6 |
| 66.7% | 86.7 | 3 | hospice | — | 0 |
| CARE SOLUTIONS LLC | 6 |
| 16.7% | 73.8 | 5 | hospice | — | 0 |
| CARROLTON FACILITY MANAGEMENT LLC | 6 |
| 33.3% | 67.5 | 1 | snf | 719 | 0 |
| CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS | 6 |
| 16.7% | 54.8 | 1 | hospice,snf | 1,688 | 0 |
| CGHII INC | 6 |
| 16.7% | 59.2 | 1 | snf | 335 | 0 |
| CHARIS TR DTD 12 22 2016 | 6 |
| 33.3% | 47.6 | 1 | snf | 636 | 0 |
| COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY | 6 |
| 0.0% | 45.4 | 1 | snf | 925 | 0 |
| Community Care Of Western New York, Inc. | 6 |
| 0.0% | 15.6 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CORPORATION | 6 |
| 0.0% | 39.9 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| COVENANT HOME HEALTH HOLDING LLC | 6 |
| 16.7% | 59.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| DELTA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | 6 |
| 33.3% | 49.2 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 222 | 0 |
| DISCOVERY PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC. | 6 |
| 0.0% | 17.8 | 1 | alf | 42 | 6 |
| DMD MANAGEMENT INC | 6 |
| 33.3% | 60.5 | 1 | snf | 710 | 0 |
| DUMOLIN SERVICE CORPORATION | 6 |
| 0.0% | 54.3 | 1 | icf iid | 36 | 0 |
| EMERITUS CORPORATION | 6 |
| 33.3% | 55.9 | 2 | alf | — | 1 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.