Owners / HEALTH AT HOME HOLDINGS LLC
HEALTH AT HOME HOLDINGS LLC
Facilities
24
across 14 states
Chains touched
1
operating names in fleet
Certified beds
—
Fleet mean score
64.6
composite percentile
D/F facilities
4
Open ML connections
0
Fleet
24| Facility | St | Setting | Chain | Beds | Stake | Role | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARETENDERS HOSPICE | MI | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 98.6 | F |
| CARETENDERS HOSPICE | OH | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 97.8 | F |
| ASSURED HOME HEALTH | OK | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 91.9 | D |
| CARETENDERS HOSPICE | OH | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 86.4 | D |
| ASSURED HOSPICE | OR | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 84.7 | C |
| CARETENDERS HOSPICE | OH | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 78.3 | C |
| ALABAMA HOMECARE OF ONEONTA | AL | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 77.9 | C |
| CARETENDERS | MI | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 72.5 | C |
| ASSURED HOME HEALTH OF OKLAHOMA CITY | OK | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 71.7 | C |
| CARETENDERS | IN | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 70.7 | C |
| CARETENDERS HOSPICE | IL | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 69.3 | C |
| AT HOME HEALTHCARE | NM | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 68.7 | C |
| ASSURED HOME HEALTH | OR | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 65.7 | C |
| AT HOME HEALTHCARE | AZ | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 63.1 | C |
| BROOKDALE HOME HEALTH | WA | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60.8 | C |
| CARETENDERS HOSPICE | MN | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 52.5 | B |
| CARETENDERS | OH | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 49.7 | B |
| SUNCREST HOME HEALTH | NC | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 49.5 | B |
| ILLINOIS HOME HEALTH CARE OF NAPERVILLE | IL | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 46.7 | B |
| ELITE HOME HEALTH | MO | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 44.0 | B |
| ALMOST FAMILY | MN | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 41.6 | B |
| SUNCREST HOME HEALTH | NC | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 41.1 | B |
| SUNCREST HOME HEALTH | NC | home health | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 36.4 | B |
| PATIENT CARE HOSPICE | PA | hospice | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | — | 100% | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30.4 | B |
role and stake are per CMS ownership disclosure; score is the deterministic composite percentile
Deal history
0No CHOW events match this owner's disclosed organization name as buyer or seller.
exact organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape — deterministic, no fuzzy merging
Deal history is exact case-insensitive organization-name matches against the CMS CHOW tape - deterministic, no fuzzy merging. ML signals come from the parallel engine.