Operating-name rollups
Chain Rollup
grade mix per operator — percentile means across peer groups are a blunt signal, the mix is the comparable statisticChains matching
2,858
with ≥ 2 facilities
| Chain | Facilities ↑ | Grade mix | % D/F | Mean pctl | States | Settings | Beds | Low evid. |
|---|
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 74.0 | 1 | snf | 257 | 0 |
| CAMERON ALF CORP | 3 |
| 0.0% | 48.4 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| CARDON AND ASSOCIATES INC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 79.1 | 1 | snf | 215 | 0 |
| CARE ONE LLC | 3 |
| 66.7% | 75.6 | 2 | home health,hospice,snf | 94 | 0 |
| Carepro Of Ny, Inc | 3 |
| 0.0% | 45.7 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CARILION CLINIC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 41.4 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| CAROL ANN'S HOME INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 47.3 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| CASA HEALTH CARE, INC. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 74.5 | 1 | icf iid | 18 | 0 |
| Catholic Managed Long Term Care, Inc. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | home health | — | 3 |
| CCH HEALTHCARE LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 66.6 | 1 | snf | 510 | 0 |
| CENTRA HEALTH INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 42.6 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| CENTRAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 48.4 | 1 | snf | 289 | 0 |
| CGA HOLDINGS INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 71.8 | 1 | home health | — | 0 |
| CHAMPION MANAGEMENT LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 21.0 | 1 | snf | 290 | 0 |
| CHESAPEAKE HEALTH PARTNERS INC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 40.1 | 1 | hospice | — | 0 |
| CHR CONSULTING SERVICES INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 65.1 | 1 | snf | 668 | 0 |
| CHRISTIAN LIVING NEIGHBORHOODS | 3 |
| 0.0% | 10.0 | 1 | snf | 197 | 0 |
| CITADEL CARE GROUP LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 52.6 | 1 | snf | 367 | 0 |
| CITRUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 44.4 | 1 | snf | 257 | 0 |
| CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU ALASKA | 3 |
| 0.0% | 27.9 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 57 | 0 |
| CLARENDON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | 3 |
| 0.0% | 28.2 | 1 | snf | 264 | 0 |
| CLEARVIEW HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT KY LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 22.4 | 1 | snf | 245 | 0 |
| COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL | 3 |
| 0.0% | 67.0 | 1 | snf | 480 | 0 |
| COMANCHE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | 3 |
| 0.0% | 53.9 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 142 | 0 |
| COMMUNITY CARE INITIATIVES, INC. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 68.8 | 1 | icf iid | 18 | 0 |
| COMMUNITY EDUCATION ASSOCIATES, INC. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 65.9 | 1 | icf iid | 18 | 0 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 54.0 | 1 | home health,snf | 112 | 0 |
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SERVICES LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 31.0 | 2 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| CONTINUING CARE LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 41.9 | 1 | alf | — | 2 |
| CONTINUING CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 37.9 | 1 | snf | 301 | 0 |
| CONTINUUM HEALTH CARE SERVICES LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 31.7 | 1 | snf | 146 | 0 |
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | 3 |
| 100.0% | 91.4 | 1 | snf | 270 | 0 |
| CORPORATE MANAGEMENT INC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 18.4 | 1 | snf | 251 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF CATTARAUGUS | 3 |
| 0.0% | 41.0 | 1 | home health,snf | 235 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF DUNN | 3 |
| 0.0% | 14.8 | 1 | snf | 137 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF FRANKLIN | 3 |
| 0.0% | 16.2 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 35 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF GRANT | 3 |
| 0.0% | 24.6 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 74 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF GUNNISON | 3 |
| 0.0% | 48.8 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 50 | 0 |
| COUNTY OF WINNEBAGO | 3 |
| 0.0% | 37.3 | 3 | home health,snf | 472 | 0 |
| COXHEALTH | 3 |
| 0.0% | 36.6 | 1 | home health,hospice,snf | 28 | 0 |
| CPF GRACE MANAGEMENT, LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 49.6 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| CRANAGE LLC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 71.1 | 2 | hospice | — | 0 |
| CRE ENTERPRISE, INC. | 3 |
| 0.0% | 66.1 | 1 | icf iid | 18 | 0 |
| CRESCENT COAST INC | 3 |
| 33.3% | 61.8 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| CSL BERKSHIRE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 5.9 | 1 | alf | — | 0 |
| DAYLIGHT ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0 | 1 | adult day | — | 3 |
| DAYWEST INVESTMENTS LLC | 3 |
| 0.0% | 24.4 | 1 | home health,hospice | — | 0 |
| DECATUR COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | 3 |
| 0.0% | 27.9 | 1 | snf | 247 | 0 |
| DEM FAMILY TRUST I | 3 |
| 33.3% | 81.8 | 1 | snf | 347 | 0 |
| DG 2016 HOLDINGS TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 14 2016 | 3 |
| 0.0% | 44.5 | 1 | home health,snf | 210 | 0 |
Grades are peer-group percentiles, so the grade mix is the comparable statistic. mean_percentile_position averages percentile positions across peer groups and should be read as a rough central tendency, not a score.